Celeron G5905 vs FX-4300: which is better
Intel Celeron G5905 (desktop, 2020) against AMD FX-4300 (desktop, 2012): benchmarks, games, specs and current prices.
Key differences
- FX-4300 is 9% faster in multi-threaded work (PassMark 3,008 vs 2,762).
- Celeron G5905 is 45% faster per core.
- FX-4300 is $5 cheaper ($44 vs $49).
- FX-4300 gives 21% more performance per dollar.
- Celeron G5905 has a lower TDP: 58 W vs 95 W.
- Different sockets (LGA1200 and AM3+): they need different motherboards.
| Celeron G5905 | FX-4300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 3.8 | 4.2 |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 2,762 | 3,008 |
| Single-thread rating | 2,149 | 1,479 |
| US price | from $49 | from $44 |
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Max boost | 3.5 GHz | 4.0 GHz |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | 58 W | 95 W |
| Max power | 58 W | 95 W |
| Memory | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Memory speed | 2666 MT/s | 1866 MT/s |
| PCI Express | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM3+ |
| Process | 14 nm (Intel) | 32 nm (GlobalFoundries) |
| Architecture | Comet Lake | Piledriver |
| Series | Celeron | FX |
| Release year | 2020 | 2012 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 610 | none |