Core i3-7100 vs FX-6300: which is better
Intel Core i3-7100 (desktop, 2017) against AMD FX-6300 (desktop, 2012): benchmarks, games, specs and current prices.
Key differences
- Core i3-7100 is 2% faster in multi-threaded work (PassMark 4,314 vs 4,233).
- Core i3-7100 is 53% faster per core.
- Core i3-7100 is $119 cheaper ($31 vs $150).
- Core i3-7100 gives 399% more performance per dollar.
- Core i3-7100 has a lower TDP: 51 W vs 95 W.
- Different sockets (LGA1151 and AM3+): they need different motherboards.
| Core i3-7100 | FX-6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 6.0 | 5.9 |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 4,314 | 4,233 |
| Single-thread rating | 2,269 | 1,487 |
| US price | from $31 | from $150 |
| Cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Base clock | 3.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Max boost | 3.9 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB |
| TDP | 51 W | 95 W |
| Max power | 51 W | 95 W |
| Memory | DDR4 / DDR3L | DDR3 |
| Memory speed | 2400 MT/s | 1866 MT/s |
| PCI Express | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM3+ |
| Process | 14 nm (Intel) | 32 nm (GlobalFoundries) |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake | Piledriver |
| Series | 7th Gen Core | FX |
| Release year | 2017 | 2012 |
| Integrated graphics | HD Graphics 630 | none |
Other comparisons
- Core i3-7100 vs Celeron G6900
- Core i3-7100 vs Athlon 3000G
- FX-6300 vs Celeron G6900
- FX-6300 vs Pentium Gold G6400
- FX-6300 vs Pentium Gold G6405
- FX-6300 vs Core i3-6100
- FX-6300 vs Core i5-4460
- FX-6300 vs Core i5-3570K
- FX-6300 vs Core i5-3470
- FX-6300 vs Core i5-2500K
- FX-6300 vs Core i5-2400
- FX-6300 vs Athlon 3000G