Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: which is better
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (desktop, 2024) against AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (desktop, 2025): benchmarks, games, specs and current prices.
Key differences
- Core Ultra 9 285K is 20% faster in multi-threaded work (PassMark 67,231 vs 56,040).
- Core Ultra 9 285K is 10% faster per core.
- Ryzen 9 9900X3D is about 21% faster in games at 1080p (Tom's Hardware).
- Core Ultra 9 285K is $26 cheaper ($500 vs $526).
- Core Ultra 9 285K gives 26% more performance per dollar.
- Ryzen 9 9900X3D has a lower TDP: 120 W vs 125 W.
- Different sockets (LGA1851 and AM5): they need different motherboards.
| Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 93.3 | 77.7 |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 67,231 | 56,040 |
| Single-thread rating | 5,087 | 4,628 |
| Games, 1080p, % of the best | 71.8% | 86.9% |
| US price | from $500 | from $526 |
| Cores | 24 (8P + 16E) | 12 |
| Threads | 24 | 24 |
| Base clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Max boost | 5.7 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| L3 cache | 36 MB | 128 MB |
| TDP | 125 W | 120 W |
| Max power | 250 W | 162 W |
| Memory | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Memory speed | 6400 MT/s | 5600 MT/s |
| PCI Express | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM5 |
| Process | 3 nm (TSMC N3B) | 4 nm (TSMC N4P) |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake | Zen 5 |
| Series | Core Ultra 200S | Ryzen 9000 |
| Release year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Graphics (4 Xe) | Radeon (2 CU) |
Other comparisons
- Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9800X3D
- Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D
- Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9950X
- Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Core Ultra 9 285K vs Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
- Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D2
- Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Core i9-14900K
- Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Core i9-14900
- Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Core Ultra 9 285
- Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Core Ultra 7 265K
- Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Core i9-14900KF
- Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Core i9-13900K
- Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Core i9-13900KF
- Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Ryzen 9 9900X